4.3 Article

Endophytic fungi associated with Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae) in Japan and their interactions with Puccinia polygoni-amphibii var. tovariae, a candidate for classical biological control

期刊

FUNGAL BIOLOGY
卷 116, 期 7, 页码 785-791

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2012.04.011

关键词

Endophyte diversity; ITS sequences; Japanese knotweed (Fallopia japonica); Phomopsis; Puccinia polygoni-amphibii var. tovariae; Synergistic interaction

类别

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [22380181, 227223]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [22380181] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fallopia japonica (Polygonaceae), or Japanese knotweed, is now spreading globally, causing serious problems in Europe and North America in both natural and urban habitats. There is an urgent need for alternative management solutions, and classical biological control, using co-evolved natural enemies found in the native range, is currently being investigated. Here, we isolated fungal endophytes from F. japonica in Japan, its natural habitat, to find endophytes that might increase the virulence of a coevolved rust pathogen, Puccinia polygoni-amphibii var. tovariae. A total of 1581 fungal endophytes were recovered from F. japonica and classified into 15 taxa. Five genera (Colletotrichum, Pestalotiopsis, Phoma, Phomopsis, and Alternaria) were dominant as endophytes in F. japonica. A greenhouse study of the dominant endophyte pathogen interactions revealed three types of reactions: suppressive, synergistic, and neutral. in particular, one Phomopsis isolate - closely related to Diaporthe medusaea, based on ITS sequences - promoted the pathogenic aggressiveness of P. polygoni-amphibii var. tovariae and, therefore, this interaction is potentially useful to increase the effectiveness of the rust fungus as a biological control agent of F. japonica in its invasive range. (C) 2012 The British Mycological Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据