4.7 Article

Biogas as renewable raw material for syngas production by tri-reforming process over NiCeO2 catalysts: Optimal operative condition and effect of nickel content

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 127, 期 -, 页码 47-58

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.06.014

关键词

Hydrogen production; Biogas; Catalysts; Nickel; Ceria; Tr-reforming; Fuel processor

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, Rome (MIUR, Progetti di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) within the project IFOAMS (Intensification of Catalytic Processes for [2010XFT2BB]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focused on the tri-reforming of simulated biogas over a Ni/ceria based catalysts (nickel content; 1.8 wt.%-31.0 wt.%) prepared by combustion synthesis to syngas production,. The effects of the H2O/CH4, O-2/CH4 molar ratios, reaction temperature, and nickel content on the catalysts' performances were studied along with morphological investigations. The chemical-physical analysis reveals a strong interaction between support and well dispersed nickel with some part of nickel incorporated into the CeO2 support, suggesting that the coexistence of different nickel phases, as well as the properties of the CeO2 support, can play an important role in the catalytic activity and stability of Ni/CeO2 catalysts. Among the samples examined, the catalyst with 7.7 wt.% Ni loading has showed the highest catalytic activity; tinder the reaction conditions of the feed gas molar ratios CH4/CO2/O-2/H2O = 1/0.67/0.1/0.3, GHSV = 30,000 h(-1) and reaction temperature of 800 degrees C, the conversions of CH4 and CO2 were 98.94% and 89.22% respectively producing a syngas with a H-2/CO = 1.34. Moreover, stable performances of the catalyst are denoted during 150 h. It was also observed that the H-2/CO molar ratio could be flexibly adjusted by the added amounts of oxygen and steam in order to meet the requirements of downstream processes. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据