4.7 Article

Comprehensive techno-economic assessment of dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis as alternative process steps within biomass-to-liquid production

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 577-586

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.09.029

关键词

Dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis; Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis; Biomass-to-liquid; Techno-economic assessment; Process simulation; 2nd generation biomass utilization

资金

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg Ministry of Agriculture (MLR)
  2. Agency of Renewable Resources (FNR) of the German Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection (BMELV)
  3. Karlsruhe House of Young Scientists (KHYS)
  4. DAAD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The conversion of lignocellulosic biomass, such as residual wood or straw, to synthetic fuels and chemicals is currently being developed within the bioliq (R) concept. The aim of this study is to model and assess two different biomass-to-liquid (BtL) concepts for the production of gasoline via dimethyl ether (DME) synthesis as well as gasoline and diesel via Fischer-Tropsch (FT) synthesis. The techno-economic assessment concludes that total energy efficiencies from biomass to final products range between 38 and 39%. The resulting production costs of gasoline via DME synthesis are about 1.15 (sic)/L (0.82 US$/L). Gasoline and diesel via FT synthesis can be produced at costs of about 1.23 (sic)/L (0.88 US$/L). The production costs for biomass-derived fuels are 76 to 93% higher than current market prices. However, the considered technologies are close to becoming competitive to conventional refineries since the production costs are only 7 to 18% higher than current market prices when coal is used as main feedstock. Further, the implications of negative CO2 emissions, mineral oil tax reduction and the combination of both kinds of subsidies in order to compensate high biomass feedstock costs as well as the sensitivity of production costs to biomass feedstock costs are evaluated in this study. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据