4.7 Article

Hydrogen production from yellow glycerol via catalytic oxidative steam reforming

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 695-703

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.003

关键词

Yellow glycerol; Oxidative steam reforming; Hydrogen production; Ni/CeZrO2/Al2O3

资金

  1. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT)
  2. Higher Education Research Promotion, Office of the Higher Education Commission
  3. National Research University (NRU) Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research study, a low-impurity product from glycerol purification unit of a biodiesel manufacturing called yellow glycerol, was shown to be an alternative raw material for H-2 generation via oxidative steam reforming reaction over Ni/CeZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst. The effects of operating parameters, such as water-to-yellow glycerol ratio between 3 and 9, reaction temperature in the range of 550-650 degrees C, and oxygen-to-yellow glycerol ratio from 0.25 to 0.75, were explored. Partial oxidation, steam reforming and decomposition of glycerol incorporated with water gas shift reaction were the main reactions involved producing H-2, CO and CO2 as the main gas products. The suitable operating condition found was at water-to-yellow glycerol ratio of 9, oxygen-to-yellow glycerol ratio of 0.5 and 650 degrees C where nearly complete conversion of yellow glycerol was achieved with maximized hydrogen selectivity and yield at 69% and 67%, respectively. This promoted catalyst exhibited superior activity to the unpromoted Ni/Al2O3 in enhancing the main reactions producing hydrogen while strongly inhibiting coke deposition. Compared to pure glycerol, the reforming of yellow glycerol byproduct produced relatively high H-2 yield, 4 mol H-2/mol yellow glycerol vs. 4.9 mol H-2/mol pure glycerol demonstrating that yellow glycerol is an attractive raw material for hydrogen production via the catalytic oxidative steam reforming. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据