4.7 Article

Mercury chemistry on brominated activated carbon

期刊

FUEL
卷 99, 期 -, 页码 188-196

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.04.036

关键词

Mercury; Activated carbon; Bromine; XPS; EXAFS

资金

  1. Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI)
  2. Stanford Graduate Fellowship program
  3. National Institute of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbon-based sorbents are the most widely tested sorbents for mercury removal in coal-fired power plants. A major problem in mercury removal is the limited understanding of the mechanism associated with elemental mercury (Hg-0) oxidation and its subsequent adsorption. This work investigates the possible binding mechanism of Hg-0 onto brominated fiber and powder activated carbon sorbents through packed-bed experiments in a stream of air. To better understand the mechanisms involved, a combination of spectroscopy and quantum mechanical modeling were used to characterize the sorption process. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectroscopy were used to analyze the surface and bulk chemical compositions of brominated activated carbon sorbents reacted with Hg-0. It was found that Hg-0 is oxidized at the brominated carbon surfaces at both 30 degrees C and 140 degrees C. The oxidation state of adsorbed Hg is found to be Hg2+, and coordinated to two Br atoms with no detectable bonding between Hg and O. Though plane-wave density functional theory (DFT) and density of states (DOSs) calculations indicate that Hg is more stable when it is bound to the edge C atom interacting with a single Br bound atop of Hg, a model that includes an interaction between the Hg and an additional Br atom matches best with experimental data obtained from EXAFS spectroscopy. Because the most stable structures optimized in the DFT simulations were not found on the samples analyzed using EXAFS spectroscopy, Hg surface reactions on the carbon surface are thought to be kinetically controlled. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据