3.9 Article

Advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal in A2O-BAF system treating low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio domestic wastewater

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0360-0

关键词

Anoxic zone and biologic aerated filter (A(2)O-BAF) system; domestic wastewater with low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio; advanced nitrogen and phosphorus removal; denitrifying phosphorus removal

资金

  1. Scientific Research Base
  2. Beijing Municipal Education Commission [PXM2008_014204_050843]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) [QAK200802]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A laboratory-scale anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic process (A(2)O) with a small aerobic zone and a bigger anoxic zone and biologic aerated filter (A(2)O-BAF) system was operated to treat low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio domestic wastewater. The A(2)O process was employed mainly for organic matter and phosphorus removal, and for denitrification. The BAF was only used for nitrification which coupled with a settling tank Compared with a conventional A(2)O process, the suspended activated sludge in this A(2)O-BAF process contained small quantities of nitrifier, but nitrification overwhelmingly conducted in BAF. So the system successfully avoided the contradiction in sludge retention time (SRT) between nitrifying bacteria and phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs). Denitrifying phosphorus accumulating organisms (DPAOs) played an important role in removing up to 91% of phosphorus along with nitrogen, which indicated that the suspended activated sludge process presented a good denitrifying phosphorus removal performance. The average removal efficiency of chemical oxygen demand (COD), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), and NH (4) (+) -N were 85.56%, 92.07%, 81.24% and 98.7% respectively. The effluent quality consistently satisfied the national first level A effluent discharge standard of China. The average sludge volume index (SVI) was 85.4 mL center dot g(-1) additionally, the volume ratio of anaerobic, anoxic and aerobic zone in A(2)O process was also investigated, and the results demonstrated that the optimum value was 1:6:2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据