4.5 Article

Promiscuous words

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY
卷 10, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/1742-9994-10-66

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0558265, DP0987360, DP110101163]
  2. University of Melbourne
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0987360, DP0558265] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Promiscuity is frequently used to describe animal mating behaviour, and especially to describe multiple mating by females. Yet this use of the term is incorrect, perhaps reflecting an erroneous adoption of common language to pique reader interest. We evaluated the patterns of use and misuse of the word 'promiscuity' in a representative journal of animal behaviour. This survey highlights how inappropriately the term is used, and how it can conceal critical features of animal mating strategies with intriguing evolutionary significance. Further analysis of the scientific impact of papers identified by the term promiscuous or polyandrous revealed that the former were cited less frequently. We argue that using promiscuity to describe animal mating strategies is anthropomorphic, inaccurate, and potentially misleading. Consistent with other biological disciplines, the word promiscuity should be used to describe indiscriminate mating behaviour only, and that polygyny and polyandry should be used to describe male and female mating frequency respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据