4.5 Article

Lateralization of brain activa ion in fluent and non-fluent preschool children: a magnetoencephalographic study of picture-naming

期刊

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS RESEARCH FOUNDATION
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00354

关键词

stuttering; magnetoencephalography; lateralization; source analysis; speech; preschool children; speech production; vocalization

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council [1003760]
  2. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Cognition and its Disorders [CE110001021]
  3. National Health and Research Council,Australia [543438]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE130100868]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The neural causes of stuttering remain unknown. One explanation comes from neuroimaging studies that have reported abnormal lateralization of activation in the brains of people who stutter. However, these findings are generally based on data from adults with a long history of stuttering, raising the possibility that the observed lateralization anomalies are compensatory rather than causal. The current study investigated lateralization of brain activity in language-related regions of interest in young children soon after the onset of stuttering. We tested 24 preschool-aged children, half of whom had a positive diagnosis of stuttering. All children participated in a picture-naming experiment whilst their brain activity was recorded by magnetoencephalography. Source analysis performed during an epoch prior to speech onset was used to assess lateralized activation in three regions of interest. Activation was significantly lateralized to the left hemisphere in both groups and not different between groups. This study shows for the first time that significant speech preparatory brain activation can be identified in young children during picture-naming and supports the contention that, in stutterers, aberrant lateralization of brain function may be the result of neuroplastic adaptation that occurs as the condition becomes chronic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据