4.5 Review

Telomere dysfunction, genome instability and cancer

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 2075-2090

出版社

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/2825

关键词

cancer; chromosomal instability; genomic instability; review; telomere

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Telomeres are highly specialized structures at the ends of chromosomes that are made up of tandem 5'-TTAGGG-3' repeats and a number of telomere associated proteins. By forming loop structures, the very end of a telomere is concealed and distinguished from a DNA break, thus protecting chromosomes from end-to-end fusions, misrepair and degradation. Telomere length is maintained by an enzyme called telomerase which is very weak or undetectable in most normal human somatic cells. In telomerase-negative cells, telomeric DNA is progressively lost with cell divisions until the cells undergo replicative senescence, which serves as an intrinsic mechanism to prevent normal somatic cells from replicating indefinitely. In checkpoint defective cells, telomere dysfunction resulting from excessive telomere attrition or disruption of telomere structure may initiate chromosomal instability through end-to-end fusion of unprotected chromosomes. Through propagation of breakage-fusion-bridge (BFB) cycles, genetic aberrations characteristic of cancers, including aneuploidy, loss of heterozygosity, gene amplification and gene loss can be generated. In vitro, cells with extensive chromosomal instability succumb to crisis which is characterized by wide-spread cell death. It has been reported that cells surviving crisis either have activated telomerase, or use an alternative telomere lengthening (ALT) mechanism to stabilize the existing telomeres and alleviate chromosome instability. The immortalized post-crisis cells have the potential to acquire additional genetic alterations for malignant transformation. In this review, we summarize our knowledge on the association between telomere dysfunction, genomic instability and cancer development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据