4.5 Review

Factors regulating apoptosis and homeostasis of CD4+CD25highFOXP3+ regulatory T cells are new therapeutic targets

期刊

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK
卷 13, 期 -, 页码 1472-1499

出版社

FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2741/2775

关键词

CD4(+); CD25(high); FOXP3(+); regulatory T cells; immunosuppression; homeostasis; cell survival; death; review

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CD4(+)CD25(high)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs), as an active mechanism of immune suppression, have been targeted due to their tremendous therapeutic potentials to prevent autoimmune diseases, transplant rejection, and to inhibit progression of tumors and chronic viral diseases. In last twelve years, substantial molecular differences between homeostasis of Tregs and that of other subsets of T cells and some factors specific in regulation of Treg survival have been characterized. In this overview we focus on panoramic reviewing of 91 factors, pathways and drugs, both well-characterized and newly defined, regarding the survival and homeostasis of Tregs in the following sections: 2: Tregs, an essential mechanism of immune tolerance; 3: nTregs, aTregs and other regulatory T cells; 4: co-stimulation receptor signaling; 5: innate immunity and Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling; 6: effects of cytokines and hormones; 7: transcription factors in regulation of Tregs; 8: Treg intracellular signaling and IL-4 cytokines exert their protective function on CD4+ T cells in the presence of soluble CD4 ligands, shows that they are able to reduce susceptibility to Bax-mediated apoptosis but not to CD95-dependent apoptotic pathways (289). A recent report from our laboratory showed that Tregs express higher levels of Bax than CD4+CD25- T cells (278). Our results further demonstrated for the first time that removal of Tregs via a Bax-dependent apoptosis pathway significantly enhances anti-self-tumor antigen immune responses (278), which points out that apoptosis pathway of Tregs is a new therapeutic target for treatment of immune related diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据