4.6 Article

Atmospheric nitrogen-deposition may intensify phosphorus limitation of shallow epilithic periphyton in unproductive lakes

期刊

FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
卷 54, 期 8, 页码 1759-1773

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02222.x

关键词

benthos; latitudinal gradient; nitrogen-deposition; nutrient cycling; nutrient limitation

资金

  1. Oskar and Lily Lamms Minnes Foundation
  2. Olson Borgh's Foundation
  3. Knut and Alice Wallenberg's Foundation
  4. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. We tested whether increasing atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition along a north-south gradient intensifies epilithic phosphorus (P) limitation in oligotrophic Swedish lakes from the north to the south. We examined the epilithic community at a shallow depth from seven northern and six southern Swedish lakes, and also compared the results with a lake located geographically between the two groups. We determined lake nutrient state, epilithic nutrient ratios and epilithic algal composition, as well as grazer N : P ratios, grazer-epilithon N : P imbalance, and N : P cycling ratios. 2. Epilithic communities appear to be generally more N-limited in the northern lakes and more P-limited in the southern lakes. Lake water total N (Tot-N) and epilithic N : P ratios were lower in northern than in southern lakes and the proportion of N2-fixing cyanobacteria was higher in northern than in southern lakes. 3. Gastropod grazers had lower N : P imbalances and cycled less N relative to P in northern than in southern lakes. 4. Atmospheric N-deposition showed a strong positive correlation with lake water Tot-N and a much weaker positive correlation with epilithon N : P ratios. Atmospheric N-deposition also correlated negatively with the proportion of N2- fixing cyanobacteria. 5. There are indications that increased atmospheric N-deposition towards the south might intensify P-limitation of epilithic algae and invertebrate grazers, although more studies are needed to show the strength and generality of our findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据