4.7 Article

Molecular mechanism of the anti-inflammatory activity of a natural diarylnonanoid, malabaricone C

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 52, 期 9, 页码 1680-1691

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.02.013

关键词

Cytokines; Inflammation; Malabaricone C; MAPK; NF kappa B

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The spice-derived phenolic, malabaricone C (mal C), has recently been shown to accelerate healing of the indomethacin-induced gastric ulceration in mice. In this study, we explored its anti-inflammatory activity and investigated the underlying mechanism of the action. Mal C suppressed the microvascular permeability and the levels of tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and nitric oxide in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-administered mice. At a dose of 10 mg/kg, it showed anti-inflammatory activity comparable to that of omeprazole (5 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (50 mg/kg). It also reduced the expression and activities of inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, as well as the pro- vs anti-inflammatory cytokine ratio in the LPS-treated RAW macrophages. Mal C was found to inhibit LPS-induced NF-kB activation in RAW 264.7 cells by blocking the MyD88-dependent pathway. Mal C suppressed NF-kappa B activation and iNOS promoter activity, which correlated with its inhibitory effect on I kappa B phosphorylation and degradation, and NF-kappa B nuclear translocation, in the LPS-stimulated macrophages. It also inhibited LPS-induced phosphorylation of p38 and JNK, which are also upstream activators of NF-kappa B, without affecting Akt phosphorylation. Mal C also effectively blocked the PKR-mediated activation of NF-kappa B. These findings indicate that mal C exerts an anti-inflammatory effect through NF-kappa B-responsive inflammatory gene expressions by inhibiting the p38 and JNK-dependent canonical NF-kappa B pathway as well as the PKR pathway, and is a potential therapeutic agent against acute inflammation. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据