4.7 Article

Spectral and kinetic evidence for reaction of superoxide with compound I of myeloperoxidase

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 51, 期 12, 页码 2190-2194

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.09.019

关键词

Myeloperoxidase; Superoxide; Kinetics; Free radicals

资金

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Superoxide and myeloperoxidase (MPO) are essential for the oxidative killing of bacteria by neutrophils. Previously, we developed a kinetic model to demonstrate that within the confines of neutrophil phagosomes, superoxide should react exclusively with MPO and be converted to hypochlorous acid. The model consists of all known reactions and rate constants for reactions of superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and chloride ions with MPO, except for the reaction of superoxide with compound I, which could only be estimated. Compound I is a transitory redox intermediate of MPO that is responsible for oxidizing chloride ions to hypochlorous acid. To tackle the challenge of observing the reaction between two transient species, we combined stopped-flow spectrophotometry with pulse radiolysis. Using this technique, we directly observed the reduction of compound I by superoxide. The rate constant for the reaction was determined to be 5.6 +/- 0.3 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1). This value establishes superoxide as one of the best substrates for compound I. Based on this value, the rate constant for reduction of compound II by superoxide was determined to be 1.2 +/- 0.1 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1). Within phagosomes, the reduction of compound I by superoxide will compete with the oxidation of chloride ions so that the relative concentrations of these two substrates will affect the yield of hypochlorous acid. Characterization of this reaction confirms that superoxide is a physiological substrate for MPO and that their interactions are central to an important host defense mechanism. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据