4.7 Article

Oxidative stress modulates PPARγ in vascular endothelial cells

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 48, 期 12, 页码 1618-1625

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2010.03.007

关键词

PPAR gamma; Endothelial cell; Oxidative stress; Free radicals

资金

  1. NIH [DK 074518]
  2. Veterans Affairs Medical Center

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR gamma) plays an important role in vascular regulation. However, the impact of oxidative stress on PPARy expression and activity has not been clearly defined. Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were exposed to graded concentrations of H2O2 for 0.5-72 h, or bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were exposed to alterations in extracellular thiol/disulfide redox potential (E-h) of the cysteine/cystine couple. Within 2 h, H2O2 reduced HUVEC PPAR gamma mRNA and activity and reduced the expression of two PPAR gamma-regulated genes without altering PPARy protein levels. After 4 h H2O2 exposure, mRNA levels remained reduced, whereas PPAR gamma activity returned to control levels. PPAR gamma mRNA levels remained depressed for up to 72 h after exposure to H2O2, without any change in PPARy activity. Catalase prevented H2O2-induced reductions in PPAR gamma mRNA and activity. H2O2 (1) reduced luciferase expression in HUVECs transiently transfected with a human PPAR gamma promoter reporter, (2) failed to alter PPAR gamma mRNA half-life, and (3) transiently increased expression and activity of c-Fos and phospho-c-Jun. Treatment with the AP1 inhibitor curcumin prevented H2O2-mediated reductions in PPARy expression. In addition, medium having an oxidized E-h reduced BAEC PPAR gamma mRNA and activity. These findings demonstrate that oxidative stress, potentially through activation of inhibitory redox-regulated transcription factors, attenuates PPAR gamma expression and activity in vascular endothelial cells through suppression of PPARy transcription. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据