4.7 Article

Increased oxidative stress and astrogliosis responses in conditional double-knockout mice of Alzheimer-like presenilin-1 and presenilin-2

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 45, 期 10, 页码 1493-1499

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2008.08.027

关键词

Presenilin; Oxidative stress; F-2-isoprostanes; Antioxidant; GFAP; Astrogliosis; Free radicals

资金

  1. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [05PJ14044, 06DZ19002, 06DZ19003]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2003CB716601]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conditional presenilin I and presenilin 2 double knockout causes memory dysfunction and reproduces neurodegenerative phenotypes of Alzheimer disease (AD) in mice. Oxidative stress has been long implicated predominantly in amyloidosis-mediated AD pathologies: however, its role in response to the loss-of-function pathogenic mechanism of AD remains unclear in this study. we examined the oxidative stress status in PSI and PS2 double-knockout (PS cDKO) mice using F-2-isoprostanes (iPF(20)-III) as the marker of lipid peroxidation. Lipid peroxidation was enhanced in a gender- and age-related manner in the PS cDKO mice independent of brain A beta deposition. Such oxidative abnormalities predominantly in cerebral cortex at 2-4 months of age preceded the onset of many pronounced AD neuropathologies, Suggesting that increased lipid peroxidation is not only an early pathophysiological response to PS inactivation, but also a potential culprit responsible for the AD-like neurodegenerative pathologies in the I'S cDKO mice. Western blot analysis of cortical glial fibrillary acidic protein demonstrated all increased astrogliosis response to PS inactivation, in particular in the PS cDKO mice at as young as 2 months of age, suggesting that lipid peroxidation and neuronal injury may be closely associated with the loss-of-function neuropathogenic mechanism of AD. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据