4.7 Article

Thermal decomposition properties and compatibility of CL-20 with binders HTPB, PBAN, GAP and polyNIMMO

期刊

JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY
卷 119, 期 3, 页码 1931-1939

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10973-015-4418-2

关键词

CL-20; Binder; Compatibility; DSC; Thermal decomposition kinetics; STANAG 4147

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The compatibility of filler 2,4,6,8,10,12-hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) with rocket propellant binders: hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB), butadiene-acrylonitrile-acrylic acid terpolymer (PBAN), glycidyl azide polymer (GAP) and poly(3-nitratomethyl-3-methyloxetane) (polyNIMMO), has been examined. The compatibility of the compounds has been tested in accordance with the STANAG 4147 standard and its modification consisting in the change of the heating rate. As it arises from STANAG 4147 standard criterion, CL-20 is not compatible with polyNIMMO, PBAN and GAP and possibly incompatible with HTPB. Changes of relative position of peaks between measurements performed in hermetical pans and pans with a pinhole and with different heating rate were observed. In case of polyNIMMO and HTPB, changes of measurement parameters lead to estimated compatibility change. The analysis of the thermal decomposition of CL-20 revealed that it is a two-phase process. The first phase is associated with decomposition in solid phase; the second phase is associated with decomposition of volatile intermediate products of CL-20 decomposition. Due to the complex process of decomposition of tested samples, the apparent activation energy was used for the assessment of the compatibility. The apparent activation energy of the initial phase of decomposition CL-20 and its mixtures with binders are compatible with one another within the limits of measurement error. Results of measurement of apparent activation energy do not indicate a destabilizing effect of binders on the initial phase of decomposition of CL-20.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据