4.2 Article

Survival of acid adapted and non-acid adapted Salmonella Typhimurium in pasteurized orange juice and yogurt under different storage temperatures

期刊

FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL
卷 19, 期 5, 页码 407-414

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/1082013212455343

关键词

Salmonella Typhimurium; food safety

资金

  1. Junta de Castilla y Leon [LE002A07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The survival capacity of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium acid adapted and non-acid adapted cells was monitored in pasteurized yogurt (pH 4.1) and orange juice (pH 3.6) during storage at different temperatures (4, 10, 25 and 37 celcius). Acid adapted and non-acid adapted cells were obtained by means of their growth for 36 h in Brain Heart Infusion broth acidified at pH 4.8 with citric acid and buffered (pH 7.0) Brain Heart Infusion broth, respectively. S. typhimurium showed a great ability to survive in both foodstuffs and, especially, in yogurt, where both acid adapted and non-acid adapted populations suffered only a reduction of about 1.3-1.9 log(10) cycles after 43 days of storage in the range of temperatures 4-25 celcius. At 37 celcius a higher bacterial inactivation was observed (4.0-4.4 log(10) cycles). In orange juice, a different behaviour was observed for acid-adapted and non-acid adapted cells. Whereas non-acid adapted cells survived better than acid adapted cells at 4 and 10 celcius, acid adapted cells showed enhanced survival abilities at higher temperatures (25 and 37 celcius). Thus, the times required to achieve a 5 log(10) cycles reduction for non-acid adapted and acid adapted cells were 10.2 and 6.0 (4 celcius), 6.3 and 4.2 (10 celcius), 0.6 and 1.0 (25 celcius) and 0.10 and 0.15 (37 celcius) days, respectively. Evidence found in this study demonstrates that refrigeration temperatures protect S. typhimurium from inactivation in acid foods and indicates that S. typhimurium acid tolerance response (ATR) is determined by storage temperature and food composition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据