4.7 Article

Olive glutaraldehyde-like compounds against plant pathogenic bacteria and fungi

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 125, 期 4, 页码 1262-1266

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.10.055

关键词

Table olives; Wastewater; Bactericidal; Fungicidal; Hydroxytyrosol; Elenolic acid

资金

  1. Spanish Government [AGL-2006-01552]
  2. Junta de Andalucia Government [P07-AGR-03105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aqueous solutions from table olives constitute a major environmental problem because of their high mineral and organic contamination but they also contain compounds with antimicrobial properties In this study the bactericidal and fungicidal activities of salt-free table olive solutions against several phytopathogenic micro-organisms were examined The storage solutions of black ripe olives showed noticeable bactericidal activity against species of Erwinia Clavibacter Agrobacterium and Pseudomonas although the washing waters from Spanish-style green olives were less effective In fact black olive storage solutions diluted to 20-30% were able to reduce the inoculated population of Erwinia amylovora and Pseudomonas syringae up to 6-7 log This bactericidal activity was correlated with the presence of olive glutaraldehyde-like compounds such as the dialdehydic form of decarboxymethyl elenolic acid in these solutions either free or linked to hydroxytyrosol Experiments in vitro demonstrated that the bactericidal activity of these substances could explain most of the activity of the black olive storage solutions Moreover these salt-free table olive solutions also showed fungicidal activity against species of Phytophthora Colletotrichum Alternaria Botrytis and Pestalotiopsis The black olive storage solutions were more fungicidal than the washing solutions from Spanish-style green olives with mycelial growth inhibition of up to 100% being attained in some instances These findings open the possibility of using table olive wastewaters in agriculture for pest management Published by Elsevier Ltd

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据