4.7 Article

Oxidized casein impairs antioxidant defense system and induces hepatic and renal injury in mice

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 64, 期 -, 页码 86-93

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2013.10.039

关键词

Fibrosis; Nrf2; Oxidized casein; Oxidative stress; Protein oxidation

资金

  1. Open Project Program of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University [SKLF-MB-200803]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30571347]
  3. National 863 Hi-Tech R and D Plan [2007AA10Z325]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP111A36]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Scope: Oxidized protein products (OPPs) can be easily found in meat and milk during processing and storage. Evidence supports that accumulation of endogenous OPPs plays a negative role in physiological metabolism. However, the impacts of dietary OPPs and the mechanisms have not been elucidated yet. The present study evaluated whether oral oxidized casein would destruct the antioxidant defense system and cause potential oxidized injury in mice liver and kidney. Methods and results: We performed oxidized casein (modified respectively by H2O2-Cu and MOO) feeding experiments using KM mice (20-22 g). A 10-weeks feeding of oxidized casein as basal protein caused oxidative stress by increasing protein carbonylation (PC), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPPs), dityrosine (Dityr), lipid peroxidation and ROS levels in mice liver, kidney and blood (P < 0.05). In mice liver and kidney, the mRNA expression of Nrf2, gamma-GCS, HO-1, GPX-3, and GPX-4 up-regulated, the protein level of Nrf2 in nucleus increased. However, activities of anti-oxidant enzymes (CAT, SOD, and GPX) decreased (P < 0.05). Moreover, histopathological examination displayed the formation of fibrous septa in mice liver and kidney after oxidized casein feeding. Conclusion: Oxidized casein impairs antioxidant defense system and induces hepatic and renal fibrosis. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据