4.7 Article

Influence of royal jelly on the reproductive function of puberty male rats

期刊

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 50, 期 6, 页码 1834-1840

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.02.098

关键词

Royal jelly; Pubescent male rats; Reproductive function; Sperm; Sex hormone

资金

  1. Science and Technology Support Program of Jiangxi Province [20111BBF60025]
  2. Research Foundation for Young Scientists of State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology [SKLF-QN-201111]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University [SKLF-KF-201007, SKLF-TS-201109, SKLF-MB-201002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adverse effects of royal jelly on the reproductive system of puberty male rats were investigated. Royal jelly was daily administered by gavage to Sprague-Dawley rats at doses 200, 400, and 800 mg/kg for 4 weeks. The body weight and organ coefficients were determined. Sperm count, spermatozoa abnormality, and testicular histopathology were examined through light microscopy. Radioimmunoassay was used to detect serum hormones. The dietary exposure to royal jelly did not affect body weight, but the organ coefficients for the pituitary and testis in the high-dose group were decreased significantly compared with the control group, and significant changes in the microstructure of the testis were observed. No significant differences in sperm count were observed among all groups, however, the sperm deformity rate in the high-dose group increased significantly. Serum hormones in the high-dose group were significantly different from the control group. After royal jelly was stopped for 14 days, the adverse changes were partially reversed and returned to levels close to those in the control group. In conclusion, high-dose royal jelly oral administration for 4 weeks adversely affected the reproductive system of pubescent male rats, but the unfavorable effects are alleviated to some extent by cessation of administration. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据