4.0 Article

Targeted engineering of the Drosophila genome

期刊

FLY
卷 3, 期 4, 页码 274-277

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.4161/fly.9978

关键词

phiC31 integrase; homologous recombination; ends-out targeting; ends-in targeting; RMCE; SIRT; IMAGO; genomic engineering; Drosophila

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of phi C31 phage integrase in Drosophila for unidirectional and site-specific DNA integration was pioneered by Groth et al. in 2004,1 and quickly triggered a wave of innovative tools taking advantage of these unique properties of phi C31. Three recent papers have further developed novel approaches that combine the phi C31-mediated DNA integration with the homologous recombination (HR)-based gene targeting(2,3) for the purpose of efficient and targeted modifications of Drosophila genomic loci. Despite significant differences, the general strategies are similar in principle in the SIRT (site-specific integrase mediated repeated targeting) approach by Gao et al.(4) the IMAGO (integrase-mediated approach for gene knock-out) approach by Choi et al. 5 and the genomic engineering approach developed by our group. 6 All three use HR-based gene targeting to first implant a single or a pair of phi C31-attP recombination sites into the target locus. Flies carrying such targeted insertions of attP sites can then be used as founder lines, in which modified DNA sequences (knock-in DNA) can be repeatedly and efficiently inserted back into the target locus via phi C31-mediated integration. Thus, by carrying out the targeting experiments only once, one can then directly and efficiently modify the target locus into virtually any desired knock-in allele. Here we give a brief overview of the SIRT, IMAGO and genomic engineering approaches and propose a revised genomic engineering scheme in which a single ends-out targeting event will generate founder lines suitable for both recombinase-mediated cassette exchange (RMCE) and single-site based integration of knock-in DNA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据