4.3 Article

The role of phenology, growth and nutrient retention during leaf fall in the competitive potential of two species of mediterranean shrubs in the context of global climate changes

期刊

FLORA
卷 203, 期 7, 页码 578-589

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.flora.2007.09.008

关键词

Climate change; Leaf traits; Mediterranean shrubs; Nutrient cycling; Phenology; Summer drought

资金

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia [PRAXIS/AGR/3/3.2/25/94]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phenological patterns, nutrient cycling of the Mediterranean shrubs Cistus salviifolius and Cistus ladanifer were analysed during 2 years of contrasted precipitation to compare their life strategies and their competitive potential to cope with future climate changes, leading to increased drought. The phenophases of both Study species occurred mostly in spring, the most favourable period of the year, but while C salviifolius produced greater number of shoot and leaves, C. ladanifer showed greater leaf area production, greater specific leaf mass and longer leaf life span. The latter species also showed more efficient N and P leaf resorption and recycling. Growth of both species was highly dependent on rainfall distribution pattern, but the two species exhibited different strategies to face the limitations imposed by the summer drought. C.salviifolius exhibited high seasonal dimorphism in plant Structure, with great leaf shedding before summer drought, while the Structure and biomass of C. ladanifer showed lower relative change throughout the year. The increase in length and intensity of drought also caused greater variation on growth rates and leaf duration and shedding in C. salviifolius than in C. ladanifer. Results suggest that C. ladanifer has greater stress-tolerance ability and hence higher competitive potential in response to varying environmental conditions, Including increasing drought stress, which is expected to occur with the ongoing global climatic changes. (c) 2008 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据