4.5 Article

The impact of catch-and-release on the foraging behaviour of pike (Esox lucius) when released alone or into groups

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 125, 期 -, 页码 51-56

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2012.01.017

关键词

Recreational fishing; Angling; Intraspecific interactions; Predation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council Formas
  2. Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-Community
  3. Federal Ministry for Education and Research [01UU0907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A commonly practiced method intended to reduce mortality from recreational fisheries is mandatory (e.g., small fish protected by minimum-size limits) or voluntary catch-and-release (C&R), where fish are caught with hook and line and released alive on the assumption that fish survive unharmed. C&R can, however, have both lethal and sub-lethal consequences for fish, with altered behaviour serving as a useful indicator of sub-lethal effects. We here present a mesocosm study on the short-term effects on foraging-behaviour in response to C&R in pike (Esox lucius). when being released alone or into conspecific groups. Due to the potential of cannibalistic attacks or agonistic interactions post-release, we expected that foraging behaviour would be affected by social environment at release. We found that the time to first interest in and attack on prey was significantly delayed in caught and released pike individuals, but these delays were less pronounced in pike released into groups of conspecifics. We also found that the caught and released pike expressed agonistic behaviours in comparable frequencies to unfished group conspecifics. We conclude that the short-term effects of C&R involve altered foraging behaviours, partly depending on the social context at release. Altered feeding, even if only in the short-term, may reduce body growth post-release, which may affect individual fitness and also have effects at the fish community level as a result of changes in pike predation pressure. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据