4.5 Article

Developing an integrated habitat index for bigeye tuna (Thunnus obesus) in the Indian Ocean based on longline fisheries data

期刊

FISHERIES RESEARCH
卷 105, 期 2, 页码 63-74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2010.03.004

关键词

Integrated habitat index; Longline; Indian Ocean; Thunnus obesus

资金

  1. Ministry of Agriculture of the Peoples Republic of China [Z05-30, Z06-43]
  2. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [S30702]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2007AA092202]
  4. Initiation Fund for Doctors of Shanghai Ocean University [B-8202-08-0290]
  5. Guangyuang Fishery Group Ltd of Guangdong province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two surveys were conducted in 2005 and 2006 aboard Chinese longliners in the Indian Ocean to evaluate how environmental variables might influence the spatial distributions of bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus. Models were developed to estimate integrated habitat indices (IHI) for bigeye tuna at eight depth strata between 80 m and 400 m and to predict the spatial distributions of bigeye tuna in these depths. Catch rates and environmental variables (water temperature, salinity, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen) at these depth strata were obtained at 30 sampling stations in the survey, and the quantile regression method was used to develop the IHI models. This study suggests that the weighted average temperature, chlorophyll-a, and dissolved oxygen (when the dissolved oxygen was less than 0.85 mg L(-1)) had significant impacts on the spatial distribution of bigeye tuna. The IHI models developed in this study performed well in predicting catch rates with selected environmental variables. The key environmental parameters in the IHI models differed among the depth strata, suggesting impacts of the environmental variables on the tuna distribution differed among different depth strata. This study provides an effective approach to identify optimal habitats for the bigeye tuna. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据