4.3 Article

Movements, behavior, and habitat utilization of yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) in waters surrounding the Revillagigedo Islands Archipelago Biosphere Reserve, Mexico

期刊

FISHERIES OCEANOGRAPHY
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 65-82

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/fog.12047

关键词

behavior; habitat; movements; utilization distributions; yellowfin tuna

资金

  1. Tagging of Pacific Pelagics, a program of the Census of Marine Life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The movements, behavior, and habitat utilization of yellowfin tuna, Thunnus albacares, following capture and release with archival tags in the Revillagigedo Islands Archipelago Biosphere Reserve (RIABR), Mexico, are described from analyses of 16578days of time-series data, downloaded from 52 archival tags recovered from yellowfin (78-173cm in length and 1.7-8.0yr of age) at liberty from 93 to 1773days (x = 411days), collected during 2006-2012. An unscented Kalman filter model with sea-surface temperature measurements integrated (UKFsst) was used to process the archival tag data sets to obtain improved estimates of geographic positions, most probable tracks (MPTs), and movement parameters. The MPTs indicate restricted movements, low levels of dispersion, and fidelity of yellowfin tuna to the RIABR. The median parameter estimates from the UKFsst model for errors in longitude (sigma(x)) and latitude (sigma(y)) were 0.46 degrees and 1.84 degrees, respectively, for directed movements (u and v) -0.05 NM day(-1) and -0.05 NM day(-1), respectively, and for dispersive movement (D) 117.99 NM2 day(-1). Analyses of daily timed depth and temperature records resulted in the classification of the data into four distinct behaviors. There are significant differences among ages in the durations of Type I and Type II diving behaviors and in the daytime and nighttime vertical habitat utilization distributions. The oceanography surrounding the RIABR appears to have a profound influence on the movements, behavior, and habitat utilization of yellowfin in this area.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据