4.7 Article

White shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei that had received the hot-water extract of Spirulina platensis showed earlier recovery in immunity and up-regulation of gene expressions after pH stress

期刊

FISH & SHELLFISH IMMUNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 6, 页码 1092-1098

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsi.2010.09.002

关键词

Litopenaeus vannamei; Hot-water extract of Spirulina platensis; pH stress; Immune parameters; Gene expressions

资金

  1. National Science Council [NSC 98-2313-B-019-022-MY3]
  2. Council of Agriculture, Taiwan, ROC [93-No-Ker-9.2.2.-Yu-F1-10]
  3. Center for the Marine Bioenvironment and Biotechnology, National Taiwan Ocean University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

White shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei which had been immersed in seawater (35 parts per thousand, pH 8.2) containing the hot-water extract of Spirulina platensis at 0 (control), 200, 400, and 600 mg L-1 for 3 h, were transferred to seawater at pH 6.8, and the immune parameters and transcripts of the lipopolysaccharide- and beta-glucan-binding protein (LGBP), peroxinectin (PX), and integrin beta (IB) were examined 6-96 h post-transfer. Shrimp with no exposure to the hot-water extract and no pH change served as the background control. Results indicated that the hyaline cells, granular cells (including semi-granular cells), total haemocyte count, phenoloxidase activity, respiratory burst, superoxide dismutase activity, glutathione peroxidase activity, and lysozyme activity of shrimp transferred to seawater at pH 6.8 significantly decreased to the lowest at 6 h post-transfer. These immune parameters of shrimp immersed in 600 mg L-1 of the extract were significantly higher than those of control shrimp at 24-96 h post-transfer, and had returned to the background values earlier at 48-72 h post-transfer with significant transcripts of LGBP, PX, and 1B at 24, 6, and 24 h, respectively, whereas these parameters of control shrimp returned to the original values at >= 96 h post-transfer. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据