4.7 Article

Sperm selected by both birefringence and motile sperm organelle morphology examination have reduced deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 101, 期 3, 页码 647-652

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.029

关键词

Birefringence; DNA fragmentation; male infertility; MSOME; sperm selection

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate DNA fragmentation in single sperm selected by both birefringence and motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME) with a single instrument. Design: Prospective study. Setting: University setting. Patient(s): Semen samples from 33 normozoospermic subjects. Intervention(s): Birefringence and MSOME to distinguish different categories of sperm: nonbirefringent (category A), birefringent (category B), birefringent with nuclear vacuoles (category C), and birefringent with no nuclear vacuoles (category D). From each semen sample, sperm of any category were selected and further analyzed by TUNEL test. Main Outcome Measure(s): A total of 660 well-characterized sperm were evaluated for DNA fragmentation. Result(s): Category A showed a low percentage of sperm with normal MSOME results (19.4%) and high prevalence of DNA fragmentation (70.3%). Category B had 81.8% normal MSOME results, and in this group 31.8% had fragmentated DNA. Category C showed 31.8% and 92.6% DNA fragmentation in sperm with small and large nuclear vacuoles, respectively. Birefringent sperm with normal MSOME results and no vacuoles showed the lowest percentage of fragmented DNA (2.8%). Conclusion(s): Sperm selection by birefringence or MSOME alone had one-third probability to select sperm with fragmented DNA. The lowest percentage of DNA fragmentation was found in birefringent sperm with no nuclear vacuoles and normal MSOME results. We suggest combining both methods using a single microscope and selecting sperm without nuclear vacuoles to get sperm with a higher chance of having intact DNA. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据