4.7 Article

Trophoblast retrieval and isolation from the cervix (TRIC) for noninvasive prenatal screening at 5 to 20 weeks of gestation

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 102, 期 1, 页码 135-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.008

关键词

Endocervical canal; fetal gender; prenatal testing; single-cell analysis; trophoblast

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH [HD071408]
  2. W.K. Kellogg Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To use trophoblast cells accumulating in the endocervical canal at the beginning of pregnancy for noninvasive prenatal testing. Design: Prospective, double-blinded test for fetal gender. Setting: Academic medical center. Patient(s): Fifty-six women with singleton pregnancies at gestational age 5-20 weeks. Intervention(s): Isolation of fetal cells from resident maternal cells in endocervical specimens using anti-human leukocyte antigen G coupled to magnetic nanoparticles; cell phenotyping immunofluorescently with a panel of trophoblast subtype-specific proteins; DNA integrity assessment with terminal dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL); and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect sex chromosomes in individual cells. Main Outcome Measure(s): Trophoblast phenotype, TUNEL index, and percentage male cells. Result(s): The women were given a routine Papanicolaou test; fetal genders were verified from medical records. Recovery after immunomagnetic isolation averaged 746 +/- 59 cells across gestational age, with 99% expressing chorionic gonadotropin, whereas the depleted cell fraction expressed none. The isolated cells had an extravillous trophoblast phenotype and intact nuclear DNA (> 95%). Fetal gender was determined in 20 specimens without error by PCR. The FISH analysis of isolated cells from male specimens validated their fetal origin. Conclusion(s): Noninvasive prenatal testing is feasible beginning at a gestational age of 5 weeks. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据