4.7 Article

Potential biomarkers of nonobstructive azoospermia identified in microarray gene expression analysis

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 100, 期 6, 页码 1686-+

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.1999

关键词

Azoospermia; biomarkers; infertility; microarrays

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [N R13 0066 06]
  2. National Science Center [2012/05/N/NZ5/00893]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To identify potential biomarkers of azoospermia to determine a particular stage of spermatogenetic differentiation. Design: GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST microarray with validation at mRNA and protein levels. Setting: Basic research laboratory. Patient(s): Men with various types of nonobstructive azoospermia (n = 18) and with normal spermatogenesis (n = 4). Intervention(s): Obtaining 31 testicular biopsy samples. Main Outcome Measure(s): Gene expression analysis using the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays on 14 selected genes according to the highest fold change, verified with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and on independent set of microarray samples. Western blot and immunohistochemistry were additionally performed. Result(s): The comparative analysis of gene expression profiles in the infertile and control groups resulted in the selection of 4,946 differentially expressed genes. AKAP4, UBQLN3, CAPN11, GGN, SPACA4, SPATA3, and FAM71F1 were the most significantly down-regulated genes in infertile patients. Global analysis also led to identification of up-regulated genes-WBSCR28, ADCY10, TMEM225, SPATS1, FSCN3, GTSF1L, and GSG1-in men with late maturation arrest. Moreover, the results from quantitative polymerase chain reaction and Western blot largely confirmed the microarray data. Conclusion(s): The set of selected genes can be used to create a molecular diagnostic tool to determine the degree of spermatogenic impairment for men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia. (Fertil Steril (R) 2013;100:1686-94. (C)2013 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据