4.7 Article

Effect of sperm DNA fragmentation on pregnancy outcome depends on oocyte quality

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 124-128

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.055

关键词

DNA; fertilization process; fragmentation; oocyte quality; sperm; sperm cryopreservation; swim-up

资金

  1. IMPIVA (Generalitat Valenciana) [IMIDTF/2009/146]
  2. Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear [SRO/2667/2009/640]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To quantify the effect of sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) on reproductive outcome by evaluating the most statistically significant bias factors using logistic regression. Design: Prospective blind observational cohort study. Setting: University affiliated private IVF unit. Patient(s): Two hundred ten male partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) or first intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles with fresh or thawed sperm with the women's own or donated oocytes. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): SDF determined before and after swim-up (n = 420), odds ratio calculated of the effect of an increase of one unit of SDF on pregnancy, and stratified regression analysis performed to evaluate the confusion effect of oocyte quality, sperm origin, and the fertilization procedure. Result(s): The effect of SDF on pregnancy was not affected by sperm origin (fresh or thawed) or fertilization procedure when measured both before and after swim-up. When oocytes from infertile patients were employed, SDF had a statistically significant negative impact on chance of pregnancy. For every 10% increase in SDF, the probability of not achieving pregnancy increased by 1.31. When donated oocytes were employed, SDF did not have a statistically significant effect. Conclusion(s): The effect of SDF on the probability of pregnancy can be calculated independent of the fertilization procedure or sperm origin. Oocyte quality conditions the extent of the negative impact of SDF on pregnancy; this can be overcome when good quality oocytes are employed. (Fertil Steril(R) 2011;95:124-8. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据