4.7 Article

Altered ultrastructure of mitochondrial membranes is strongly associated with unexplained asthenozoospermia

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 95, 期 2, 页码 641-646

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.07.1086

关键词

Asthenozoospermia; sperm ultrastructure; sperm tail middle piece; mitochondria

资金

  1. Ministero dell'Universita e della Ricerca Scientifica, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the contribution of an altered structure of sperm mitochondria to human asthenozoospermia. Design: A retrospective study. Setting: Andrology Clinic, University of L'Aquila. Patient(s): Fifteen ejaculates with forward motility (FM) >= 50%, and 57 asthenozoospermic ejaculates (FM <50%, sperm vitality >50%), including 14 ejaculates with systematic genetic defects of tail principal piece, and 43 ejaculates with unexplained asthenozoospermia. Intervention(s): Fifty sections of tail middle piece (MP) were blindly analyzed by transmission electron microscopy in each ejaculate for normal mitochondrial membrane organization, after exclusion of tails with disrupted cell membranes. Main Outcome Measure(s): Percentage of MPs with normal mitochondrial membranes (% normal MPs). Result(s): Percent normal MPs showed a strong correlation with forward motility. Variation of % normal MPs explained a 45% variation of sperm motility at multivariate linear regression analysis, confirming the strong association between the two parameters in a population including ejaculates with normal motility and with unexplained asthenozoospermia. Percent normal MPs was significantly reduced in severe unexplained asthenozoospermia (FM <10%; n = 16) compared with samples with normal motility (FM >= 50%; n = 15); 21% (10.5%-38%) and 68% (52%-73%), respectively. Conclusion(s): Structural defects in mitochondrial membranes represent a main feature of severe unexplained asthenozoospermia. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;95:641-6. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据