4.7 Article

Adolescent girls with polycystic ovary syndrome showing different phenotypes have a different metabolic profile associated with increasing androgen levels

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 92, 期 2, 页码 626-634

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.004

关键词

Polycystic ovary syndrome; adolescence; hyperandrogenemia; dyslipidemia; insulin resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate the metabolic profiles of adolescents with different phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: Observational study. Setting: University outpatient clinic. Patient(s): Adolescents with PCOS (n = 120) were divided into four groups: oligomenorrhea and hirsutism (O-H, n = 50), oligomenorrhea, hirsutism, and polycystic ovaries (PCO-O-H, n = 22), oligomenorrhea, hirsutism, and hyperandrogenemia (A-O-H, n = 28), oligomenorrhea, and hirsutism, hyperandrogenemia, and polycystic ovaries (PCO-A-O-H, n = 20). A control group of age-matched adolescents (n = 30) was included. Intervention(s): Subjects underwent physical and ultrasound evaluations; fasting blood samples were taken for the measurement of endocrine and metabolic parameters. Main Outcome Measure(s): The endocrine and metabolic profiles were evaluated. Result(s): Adolescents with PCOS showed reduced insulin sensitivity and dyslipidemia. Triglycerides, and total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were higher in the phenotypes with hyperandrogenemia. Insulin resistance and body mass index were not significantly different between PCOS phenotypes. Triglyceride positively and high-density lipoportein cholesterol levels negatively correlated with free testosterone and free androgen index. Conclusion(s): The risk of metabolic alterations may vary in adolescent PCOS patients with different phenotypes. Hyperandrogenemia is a risk factor for dyslipidemia. This information may be of relevance in counseling adolescents with PCOS. (Fertil Steril (R) 2009;92:626-34. (C)2009 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据