4.7 Article

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid plus prednisolone as an adjuvant treatment in IVF: a prospective, randomized study

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 90, 期 5, 页码 1685-1691

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.08.037

关键词

Acetylsalicylic acid; prednisolone; in vitro fertilization; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; uterine blood fluxes; embryo implantation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To test whether adjuvant therapy with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and prednisolone (ASA+Pred) could improve the outcome of IVF in good-pregnancy prognosis patients. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Three hundred ninety-five infertile couples undergoing IVF. Intervention(s): Patients were randomized to receive ASA+Pred (n = 97) or nothing (n = 298), in addition to the routinely used IVF medications. Main Outcome Measure(s): The primary endpoint was implantation rate (IR). Secondary endpoints were number of retrieved oocytes and pregnancy rate (PR). The blood flow in uterine arteries and subendometrial vessels also was measured. Result(s): Patients who received ASA+Pred had significantly more retrieved oocytes. The PR and IR in the study group and in controls were 50.5% and 40.6% and 25.1% and 19.4%, respectively, values that were not significantly different from one another. Uterine blood flows were not significantly different between treated and nontreated patients. A statistically significantly lower incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome was noted among treated patients who were at high risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (1.7% vs. 6.5%). Conclusion(s): Adjuvant treatment with ASA+Pred improves ovarian responsiveness but does not significantly improve uterine blood fluxes, PR, and IR. It may be effective in preventing the onset of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. (Fertil Steril(R) 2008;90:1685-91. (C)2008 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据