4.3 Article

Investigating the effects of positive charge and hydrophobicity on the cell selectivity, mechanism of action and anti-inflammatory activity of a Trp-rich antimicrobial peptide indolicidin

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY LETTERS
卷 292, 期 1, 页码 134-140

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01484.x

关键词

antimicrobial peptide; indolicidin; cell selectivity; positive charge; hydrophobicity; mechanism of action

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology, Korea
  2. Korea Science and Engineering Foundation [R11-2000-083-00000-0]
  3. Chosun University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To investigate the effects of positive charge and hydrophobicity on the cell selectivity, mechanism of action and anti-inflammatory activity of a Trp-rich antimicrobial peptide indolicidin (IN), a series of IN analogs with Trp -> Lys substitution were synthesized. All IN analogs displayed an approximately 7- to 18-fold higher cell selectivity, compared with IN. IN, IN-1 and IN-2 depolarized (50-90%) the cytoplasmic membrane potential of Staphylococcus aureus close to minimal inhibitory concentration (5-10 mu g mL(-1)). However, other IN analogs (IN-3 and IN-4) displayed very low ability in membrane depolarization even at 40 mu g mL(-1). Confocal laser-scanning microscopy revealed that IN-3 and IN-4 penetrated the Escherichia coli cell membrane, whereas IN, IN-1 and IN-2 did not enter the cell membrane. In the gel retardation assay, IN-3 and IN-4 bound more strongly to DNA compared with IN, IN-1 and IN-2. These findings suggest that the mechanism of antimicrobial action of IN-3 and IN-4 may be involved in the inhibition of intracellular functions via interference with DNA/RNA synthesis. Unlike IN, all IN analogs did not inhibit nitric oxide production or inducible nitric oxide synthase mRNA expression in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated mouse macrophage RAW264.7 cells, indicating that the hydrophobicity of IN is more important for anti-inflammatory activity in lipopolysaccharide-treated macrophage cells than the positive charge.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据