4.6 Review

Brain angiogenesis in developmental and pathological processes: therapeutic aspects of vascular endothelial growth factor

期刊

FEBS JOURNAL
卷 276, 期 17, 页码 4636-4643

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.07175.x

关键词

macrophage; malignant glioma; motor neuron; tumor angiogenesis; vascular hyperpermeability; VEGF-A; VEGF-B; VEGF-E; VEGFR-1; VEGFR-2

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [17014020]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  3. Organization for Pharmaceutical Safety and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The angiogenic process in the central nervous system (CNS) is basically regulated by typical angiogenic signaling systems such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-VEGF receptors and angiopoietin-Tie receptors. In addition to regular endothelial-pericyte interaction, the CNS vasculature has a unique system of cell to cell communication between endothelial cells and astrocytes which is known as the blood-brain barrier. Among the pathological conditions of the CNS vascular network, stroke is a major disease in which the supply of blood is decreased. Pro-angiogenic therapy using natural VEGF-A has so far been unsuccessful, indicating the possible need for a new approach related to upstream or downstream regulators involved in the VEGF-signaling pathway, or alternate VEGF family members. By contrast, a pathological increase in the blood supply in the CNS is seen in brain tumors, in particular malignant gliomas. In phase II clinical trials, anti-VEGF therapies have been shown to suppress tumor growth and improve survival rates to some extent. However, tumor invasion and the distant metastasis of gliomas can occur following anti-angiogenic therapy. Further studies are needed to obtain safer clinical outcomes by developing new strategies with combination therapy using known anti-angiogenic drugs or by developing unique medicines specifically targeting the blood vessels in brain tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据