4.5 Article

Fatigue strength assessment of laser stake-welded web-core steel sandwich panels

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ffe.12038

关键词

fatigue strength; fatigue testing; J-integral; laser stake welds; steel sandwich panels

资金

  1. Department of Applied Mechanics of Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
  2. Finnish Academy of Science project 'Fatigue of Steel Sandwich Panels', Helsinki, Finland
  3. 'Merenkulunsaatio' - the Finnish Maritime Foundation, Helsinki, Finland

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the fatigue strength assessment of web-core steel sandwich panels. The production of these structures is made possible by laser stake welding. The investigation in this study considered two series of panels, one being an empty steel structure and the other filled with in situ polyurethane foam in order to increase the panel stiffness. Both series were tested under cyclic bending loading condition (R = 0) until one of the panel joints failed completely. A 3D panel bending response was analysed using finite element method. The J-integral values at the panel joints were obtained by means of plane strain finite element analysis and by using displacements from 3D panel response. The influence of the weld geometry on the J-integral value was investigated. It was found that the J-integral value is similar in the cases of the average and critical geometry. The contact between the joint plates is possible in some cases, but its influence proved to be insignificant for the fatigue strength assessment. The study further shows that by using the average geometry, the J-integral approach was able to identify the critical panel joints and present the fatigue strength results from both panel series in a narrow scatterband. The fatigue strength at two million cycles obtained for the panels within this study was in agreement with the laser stake welds and other steel joint types from previous studies. However, the slope of the panels fatigue resistance curve was found to be shallower than in the case of joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据