4.7 Article

Fully synthetic polymer vesicles for intracellular delivery of antibodies in live cells

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 27, 期 1, 页码 98-108

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.12-212183

关键词

immunotargeting; protein; antibody; nanovector

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G0701932] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [G0701932] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [G0701932] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is an emerging need both in pharmacology and within the biomedical industry to develop new tools to target intracellular mechanisms. The efficient delivery of functionally active proteins within cells is potentially a powerful research strategy, especially through the use of antibodies. In this work, we report on a nanovector for the efficient encapsulation and delivery of antibodies into live cells with no significant loss of cell viability or any deleterious effect on cell metabolic activity. This delivery system is based on poly[2-(methacryloyloxy) ethyl phosphorylcholine]-block-[2-(diisopropylamino) ethyl methacrylate] (PMPC-PDPA), a pH-sensitive diblock copolymer that self-assembles to form nanometer-sized vesicles, also known as polymersomes, at physiological pH. Polymersomes can successfully deliver relatively high antibody payloads within different types of live cells. We demonstrate that these antibodies can target their respective epitope showing immunolabeling of gamma-tubulin, actin, Golgi protein, and the transcription factor NF-kappa B in live cells. Finally, we demonstrate that intracellular delivery of antibodies can control specific subcellular events, as well as modulate cell activity and proinflammatory processes.-Canton, I., Massignani, M., Patikarnmonthon, N., Chierico, L., Robertson, J., Renshaw, S. A., Warren, N. J., Madsen, J. P., Armes, S P., Lewis, A. L., Battaglia, G. Fully synthetic polymer vesicles for intracellular delivery of antibodies in live cells. FASEB J. 27, 98-108 (2013). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据