4.7 Article

5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine reactivates gene expression via degradation of pRb pocket proteins

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 26, 期 1, 页码 449-459

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.11-190025

关键词

MDM2; histone modification

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [90919030, 31070691, 31071117, 30921062]
  2. Ministry of Education of China
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Not only does 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (5-aza-CdR) induce the reexpression of silenced genes through the demethylation of CpG islands, but it increases the expression of unmethylated genes. However, the mechanism by which 5-aza-CdR activates the expression of genes is not completely understood. Here, we report that the pRb pocket proteins pRb, p107, and p130 were degraded in various cancer cell lines in response to 5-aza-CdR treatment, and this effect was dependent on the proteasome pathway. Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) played a critical role in this 5-aza-CdR-induced degradation of pRb. Furthermore, PP2A phosphatase-induced MDM2 dephosphorylation at S260 was found to be essential for MDM2 binding to pRb in the presence of 5-aza-CdR. pRb degradation resulted in the significant reexpression of several genes, including methylated CDKN2A, RASFF1A, and unmethylated CDKN2D. Finally, knockdown of pRb pocket proteins by either RNAi or 5-aza-CdR treatment induced a significant decrease in the recruitment of SUV39H1 and an increase in the enrichment of KDM3B and KDM4A to histones around the promoter of RASFF1A and thus reduced H3K9 di- and trimethylation, by which RASFF1A expression is activated. Our data reveal a novel mechanism by which 5-aza-CdR induces the expression of both methylated and unmethylated genes by degrading pRb pocket proteins.-Zheng, Z., Li, L., Liu, X., Wang, D., Tu, B., Wang, L., Wang, H., Zhu, W.-G. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine reactivates gene expression via degradation of pRb pocket proteins. FASEB J. 26, 449-459 (2012). www.fasebj.org

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据