4.7 Article

Glucocorticoids inhibit GATA-3 phosphorylation and activity in T cells

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 5, 页码 1558-1571

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-121236

关键词

GCs; T helper 2; p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase; interleukin 5

资金

  1. Max Planck Society, Germany
  2. University of Buenos Aires (UBA)
  3. CONICET
  4. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Glucocorticoid (GC) immunosuppression and anti-inflammatory action involve the regulation of several transcription factors (TFs). GCs inhibit the acute production of T-helper (Th) 1 and Th2 cytokines but ultimately favor a shift toward Th2 phenotype. GCs inhibit the transcriptional activity of T-bet Th1 TF by a transrepression mechanism. Here we analyze GC regulation of GATA-3, the master driver of Th2 differentiation. We found that GCs inhibit GATA-3 transcriptional activity. We demonstrate that this mechanism does not involve physical interaction between the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and GATA-3 or reduction of GATA-3 binding to DNA, as described previously for T-bet. Instead, GCs inhibit GATA-3 activity by inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase induced GATA-3 phosphorylation. GCs also inhibit GATA-3 mRNA and protein expression. Finally, GATA-3 inhibition affects the interleukin-5 gene, a central Th2 cytokine. The IC50 of dexamethasone is 10 nM with a maximum effect at 100 nM. All inhibitory actions were blocked by the GR antagonist RU38486 (1 uM), proving the specificity of GR action. In view of the crucial role of GATA-3 in T-cell differentiation and inflammation, we propose that the mechanism of GATA-3 inhibition compared with that in T-bet may have relevant implications in understanding and modulating the anti-inflammatory and Th-regulatory properties of GCs. Liberman, A. C., Druker, J., Refojo, D., Holsboer, F., Arzt, E. Glucocorticoids inhibit GATA-3 phosphorylation and activity in T cells. FASEB J. 23, 1558-1571 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据