4.7 Article

Structural insight into acute intermittent porphyria

期刊

FASEB JOURNAL
卷 23, 期 2, 页码 396-404

出版社

FEDERATION AMER SOC EXP BIOL
DOI: 10.1096/fj.08-115469

关键词

human porphobilinogen deaminase; X-ray structure; heme biosynthesis; porphobilinogen hinge

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20572063, 30670427]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2006AA02A316, 2006CB910901]
  3. CAS-KIST [07CF09]
  4. U. S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [W-31-109-Eng-38]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP), an inherited disease of heme biosynthesis, is one of the most common types of porphyria. Reduced activity of the enzyme porphobilinogen deaminase (PBGD), which catalyzes the sequential condensation of 4 molecules of porphobilinogen to yield preuroporphyrinogen, has been linked to the symptoms of AIP. We have determined the 3-dimensional structure of human PBGD at 2.2 angstrom resolution. Analysis of the structure revealed a dipyrromethane cofactor molecule covalently linked to C261, sitting in a positively charged cleft region. In addition to the critical catalytic D99, a number of other residues are seen hydrogen bonded to the cofactor and play a role in catalysis. Sequential entry of 4 pyrrole molecules into the active site is accomplished by movement of the domains around the hinges. H120P mutation resulted in an inactive enzyme, supporting the role of H120 as a hinge residue. Interestingly, some of the mutations of the human PBGD documented in patients suffering from AIP are located far away from the active site. The structure provides insights into the mechanism of action of PBGD at the molecular level and could aid the development of potential drugs for the up-regulation of PBGD activity in AIP. - Song, G., Li, Y., Cheng, C., Zhao, Y., Gao, A., Zhang, R., Joachimiak, A., Shaw, N., Liu, Z.-J. Structural insight into acute intermittent porphyria. FASEB J. 23, 396-404 (2009)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据