4.6 Article

Intravitreal bevacizumab for the treatment of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy: a prospective trial

期刊

EYE
卷 27, 期 4, 页码 538-544

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2012.296

关键词

optic nerve diseases; optic neuropathy, ischemic; eye diseases; vascular diseases; bevacizumab; angiogenesis inhibitors

资金

  1. Helen Keller Foundation for Research Education

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose There is currently no accepted treatment for Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy (NAION). One new therapeutic approach involves decreasing optic nerve edema with intravitreal bevacizumab in order to resolve a proposed compartment syndrome. Methods In this non-randomized controlled clinical trial, 1.25 mg intravitreal bevacizumab was compared with natural history. Patients were examined at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months with a full neuro-ophthalmic exam, automated perimetry, and optic nerve optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurements. The primary outcome measure was change in mean deviation on Humphrey visual field testing. Secondary outcome measures were change in visual acuity and optic nerve OCT thickness. Incidence and type of complications were also recorded. Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled (17 treatment and 8 control). There was no significant effect of treatment on the primary outcome measure of mean deviation score (P = 0.4). There was similarly no effect of group assignment on the secondary outcome measures of change in mean Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters (P = 0.33) or nerve fiber layer thickness on OCT (P = 0.11). In the bevacizumab group, there was one case of a corneal abrasion and two cases of recurrent NAION. No other complications were noted. Conclusions We found no difference between bevacizumab and natural history for change in visual field, visual acuity, or optic nerve OCT thickness. Based on the current evidence we would not recommend the use of intravitreal bevacizumab to treat patients with the new onset of NAION. Eye (2013) 27, 538-544; doi:10.1038/eye.2012.296; published online 1 February 2013

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据