4.6 Article

Female reproductive factors and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Nurses' Health Study

期刊

EYE
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 633-641

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/eye.2011.34

关键词

female reproductive factors; age at menarche; parity; oral contraceptives; primary open angle glaucoma

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [CA87969, CA55075, EY09611, HL35464, EY015473]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness in New York City

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the relation between age at menarche, parity, and oral contraceptive (OC) use, and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods We followed 79 440 women in the Nurses' Health Study prospectively from 1980 to 2006 and identified 813 cases of incident POAG. Eligible participants were >= 40 years old, free of POAG at baseline, had information on reproductive history, and reported receiving eye examinations during follow-up. Relevant exposure data and POAG risk factors were updated using biennial questionnaires. We used proportional hazards models to calculate multivariable rate ratios (MVRRs) of POAG and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results In multivariable analysis, there were no significant linear trends between age at menarche (P for trend=0.65) or reproductive duration defined as time between age at menarche and menopause (P for trend=0.30) and POAG. Although ever using OCs was not associated with POAG risk (MVRR=1.14; 95% CI, 0.98, 1.34), >= 5 years of OC use was associated with a modest 25% increased risk of POAG (MVRR=1.25; 95% CI, 1.02, 1.53; P for linear trend=0.04). Furthermore, among past OC users, a shorter time since stopping OC use was also associated with an increased risk of POAG (P for linear trend=0.02). Parity was not associated with POAG risk. Conclusion The >= 5 years of OC use was associated with a modestly increased risk of POAG. These data add further support for a role of circulating estrogen in the pathogenesis of POAG. Eye (2011) 25, 633-641; doi:10.1038/eye.2011.34; published online 18 February 2011

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据