4.2 Article

Overlapping genes: a new strategy of thermophilic stress tolerance in prokaryotes

期刊

EXTREMOPHILES
卷 19, 期 2, 页码 345-353

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s00792-014-0720-3

关键词

Thermophily; Genome size reduction; Long overlaps; Codon adaptation index

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Govt. of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Overlapping genes (OGs) draw the focus of recent day's research. However, the significance of OGs in prokaryotic genomes remained unexplored. As an adaptation to high temperature, thermophiles were shown to eliminate their intergenic regions. Therefore, it could be possible that prokaryotes would increase their OG content to adapt to high temperature. To test this hypothesis, we carried out a comparative study on OG frequency of 256 prokaryotic genomes comprising both thermophiles and non-thermophiles. It was found that thermophiles exhibit higher frequency of overlapping genes than non-thermophiles. Moreover, overlap frequency was found to correlate with optimal growth temperature (OGT) in prokaryotes. Long overlap frequency was found to hold a positive correlation with OGT resulting in an abundance of long overlaps in thermophiles compared to non-thermophiles. On the other hand, short overlap (1-4 nucleotides) frequency (SOF) did not yield any direct correlation with OGT. However, the correlation of SOF with CAI(avg) (extent of variation of codon usage bias measured as the mean of codon adaptation index of all genes in a given genome) and IG% (proportion of intergenic regions) indicate that they might upregulate the aforementioned factors (CAI(avg) and IG%) which are already known to be vital forces for thermophilic adaptation. From these evidences, we propose that the OG content bears a strong link to thermophily. Long overlaps are important for their genome compaction and short overlaps are important to uphold high CAI(avg). Our findings will surely help in better understanding of the significance of overlapping gene content in prokaryotic genomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据