4.6 Article

Homocysteine plasma levels in psoriasis patients: our experience and review of the literature

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13023

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BackgroundPeople with psoriasis are at higher cardiovascular risk. Plasma levels of homocysteine over the normal range have been recognized as marker of cardiovascular risk. Psoriasis patients express higher levels of plasma homocysteine than healthy people. ObjectiveOur study aims to investigate the correlation between homocysteinaemia, severity and duration of psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis, and to evaluate the effect of a 12-week administration of a target therapy for psoriasis on homocysteinaemia. MethodsFifty-two psoriasis patients (study group) submitted to different kind of therapy for psoriasis (biological, systemic not biological and topical) and 24 healthy Italian subject (control group) were evaluated for their plasmatic homocysteine levels, both at baseline (T0) and 12weeks after they a specific therapy for psoriasis. ResultsA significant difference between the homocysteinaemia of psoriasis patients (mean 19.7111.16) and control group (13.90 +/- 11.18), P<0.05 (Fig.1), was found at baseline (T0). The mean plasma levels of homocysteine were directly correlated with disease severity (P=0.0401), but not with disease duration (P=0.6018) or presence of arthritis (P=0.6221) at baseline. None among the treatments administered to psoriasis patients caused a significant reduction in homocysteinaemia after 12weeks of treatment. ConclusionOur results confirm that psoriasis patients with more severe disease, can have hyperhomocysteinaemia, without regard to disease duration or joint involvement. Hyperhomocysteinaemia is not influenced by a target therapy for psoriasis and it is as greater as psoriasis severity. However, limitation of our study is the relatively small number of cases. Homocysteine plasmatic levels should be advisable as a further independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in psoriasis patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据