4.7 Article

Multi-stage modeling using fuzzy multi-criteria feature selection to improve survival prediction of ICU septic shock patients

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 39, 期 16, 页码 12332-12339

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.027

关键词

Fuzzy modeling; Multi-criteria; Feature selection; Sensitivity; Intensive care unit; Septic shock

资金

  1. Portuguese Government [PTDC/SEM-ENR/100063/2008]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT)
  3. MIT-Portugal
  4. FCT [SFRH/BPD/65215/2009, SFRH/43043/2008, SFRH/43081/2008]
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia
  6. Ministerio do Ensino Superior, da Ciencia e da Tecnologia, Portugal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In many binary medical classification problems, the cost of misclassifying one category is higher than the other, and in these applications it is desirable to employ a classifier with selective sensitivity or specificity. This work explores the utility of a fuzzy multi-criteria function for performance evaluation during knowledge-based medical classification and prediction. The method presented here uses fuzzy optimization to combine the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of classification as goals in a single objective function. This approach is used to assign flexible goals, which can be used to maximize the outcome in terms of each one of the goals. The proposed approach significantly increases the sensitivity and the specificity while maintaining or increasing accuracy. The versatility of the method is further exploited in a multi-model approach, using individual structures of multi-objective optimization of sensitivity and specificity separately, and then combining their outcomes through a decision-making module. Among various medical benefits derived from applying this technique, the divergent feature sets selected by high sensitivity and specificity models lend insight into factors more integrally connected to what causes risk of death for patients. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据