4.5 Review

The endless race between Trypanosoma cruzi and host immunity: lessons for and beyond Chagas disease

期刊

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1462399410001560

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ludwig Institute of Cancer Research (LICR)
  2. Atlantic Philanthropies (AP)
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)
  4. Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ)
  5. National Institute of Science and Technology for Vaccines/Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  6. US National Institutes of Health (NIH)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Infection with the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, the agent of Chagas disease, is characterised by a variable clinical course - from symptomless cases to severe chronic disease with cardiac and/or gastrointestinal involvement. The variability in disease outcome has been attributed to host responses as well as parasite heterogeneity. In this article, we review studies indicating the importance of immune responses as key determinants of host resistance to T. cruzi infection and the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. Particular attention is given to recent studies defining the role of cognate innate immune receptors and immunodominant CD8(+) T cells that recognise parasite components - both crucial for host-parasite interaction and disease outcome. In light of these studies we speculate about parasite strategies that induce a strong and long-lasting T-cell-mediated immunity but at the same time allow persistence of the parasite in the vertebrate host. We also discuss what we have learned from these studies for increasing our understanding of Chagas pathogenesis and for the design of new strategies to prevent the development of Chagas disease. Finally, we highlight recent studies employing a genetically engineered attenuated T. cruzi strain as a vaccine shuttle that elicits potent T cell responses specific to a tumour antigen and protective immunity against a syngeneic melanoma cell line.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据