4.1 Review

Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of depression

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 1761-1772

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/ERN.10.95

关键词

depression; TMS; transcranial magnetic stimulation; treatment-resistant

资金

  1. Glaxo-Smith-Kline
  2. Jazz Pharmaceuticals
  3. Brainsway

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Repeated daily left prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was first proposed as a potential treatment for depression in 1993. Multiple studies from researchers around the world since then have repeatedly demonstrated that TMS has antidepressant effects greater than sham treatment, and that these effects are clinically meaningful. A large industry-sponsored trial, published in 2007, resulted in US FDA approval in October 2008. Most recently, a large NIH-sponsored trial, with a more rigorous sham technique, found that a course of treatment (3-5 weeks) was statistically and clinically significant in reducing depression. However, consistently showing statistically and clinically significant antidepressant effects, and gaining regulatory approval, is merely the beginning for this new treatment. As with any new treatment involving a radically different approach, there are many unanswered questions about TMS, and the field is still rapidly evolving. These unanswered questions include the appropriate scalp location, understanding the mechanisms of action, refining the 'dose' (frequency, train, number of stimuli/day and pattern of delivery), understanding whether and how TMS can be combined with medications or talking/exposure therapy, or both, and how to deliver maintenance TMS. This article summarizes the available clinical information, and discusses key areas where more research is needed. TMS reflects a paradigm shift in treating depression. It is a safe, relatively noninvasive, focal brain stimulation treatment that does not involve seizures or implanted wires, and does not have drug-drug interactions or systemic side effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

Article Behavioral Sciences

Treatment of Adults with Autism and Major Depressive Disorder Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: An Open Label Pilot Study

McLeod Frampton Gwynette, Danielle W. Lowe, Erin A. Henneberry, Gregory L. Sahlem, Melanie Gail Wiley, Hussam Alsarraf, Sarah Brice Russo, Jane E. Joseph, Philipp M. Summers, Laura Lohnes, Mark S. George

AUTISM RESEARCH (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Design and validation of a closed-loop, motor-activated auricular vagus nerve stimulation (MAAVNS) system for neurorehabilitation

Daniel N. Cook, Sean Thompson, Sasha Stomberg-Firestein, Marom Bikson, Mark S. George, Dorothea D. Jenkins, Bashar W. Badran

BRAIN STIMULATION (2020)

Article Neurosciences

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Paired Rehabilitation for Oromotor Feeding Problems in Newborns: An Open-Label Pilot Study

Bashar W. Badran, Dorothea D. Jenkins, Daniel Cook, Sean Thompson, Morgan Dancy, William H. DeVries, Georgia Mappin, Philipp Summers, Marom Bikson, Mark S. George

FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold can estimate individualized tDCS dosage from reverse-calculation electric-field modeling

Kevin A. Caulfield, Bashar W. Badran, William H. DeVries, Philipp M. Summers, Emma Kofmehl, Xingbao Li, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Marom Bikson, Mark S. George

BRAIN STIMULATION (2020)

Article Clinical Neurology

Decreased interhemispheric connectivity and increased cortical excitability in unmedicated schizophrenia: A prefrontal interleaved TMS fMRI study

Ryan D. Webler, Carmen Hamady, Chris Molnar, Kevin Johnson, Leo Bonilha, Berry S. Anderson, Claartje Bruin, Daryl E. Bohning, Mark S. George, Ziad Nahas

BRAIN STIMULATION (2020)

Letter Clinical Neurology

Can transcranial electrical stimulation motor threshold estimate individualized tDCS doses over the prefrontal cortex? Evidence from reverse-calculation electric field modeling

Kevin A. Caulfield, Bashar W. Badran, Xingbao Li, Marom Bikson, Mark S. George

BRAIN STIMULATION (2020)

Review Clinical Neurology

Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines

Simone Rossi, Andrea Antal, Sven Bestmann, Marom Bikson, Carmen Brewer, Jurgen Brockmoller, Linda L. Carpenter, Massimo Cincotta, Robert Chen, Jeff D. Daskalakis, Vincenzo Di Lazzaro, Michael D. Fox, Mark S. George, Donald Gilbert, Vasilios K. Kimiskidis, Giacomo Koch, Risto J. Ilmoniemi, Jean Pascal Lefaucheur, Letizia Leocani, Sarah H. Lisanby, Carlo Miniussi, Frank Padberg, Alvaro Pascual-Leone, Walter Paulus, Angel Peterchev, Angelo Quartarone, Alexander Rotenberg, John Rothwell, Paolo M. Rossini, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Mouhsin M. Shafi, Hartwig R. Siebner, Yoshikatzu Ugawa, Eric M. Wassermann, Abraham Zangen, Ulf Ziemann, Mark Hallett

Summary: This article is based on a consensus conference held in Siena, Italy in October 2018, aiming to update safety guidelines for the application of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). New emerging issues discussed include safety concerns with recently developed stimulation devices, novel scenarios of TMS applications, and ethical considerations regarding neuroenhancement.

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Psychiatry

Identifying response and predictive biomarkers for Transcranial magnetic stimulation outcomes: protocol and rationale for a mechanistic study of functional neuroimaging and behavioral biomarkers in veterans with Pharmacoresistant depression

Leanne M. Williams, John T. Coman, Patrick C. Stetz, Nicole C. Walker, F. Andrew Kozel, Mark S. George, Jong Yoon, Laura M. Hack, Michelle R. Madore, Kelvin O. Lim, Noah S. Philip, Paul E. Holtzheimer

Summary: This study aims to evaluate the relationship between neural targets, cognitive-behavioral performance, and symptom severity, suicidality, and quality of life outcomes in pharmacoresistant depression patients undergoing TMS treatment. The results will help providers select suitable candidates for TMS treatment and predict treatment response more accurately.

BMC PSYCHIATRY (2021)

Review Clinical Neurology

Training in the practice of noninvasive brain stimulation: Recommendations from an IFCN committee

Peter J. Fried, Emiliano Santarnecchi, Andrea Antal, David Bartres-Faz, Sven Bestmann, Linda L. Carpenter, Pablo Celnik, Dylan Edwards, Faranak Farzan, Shirley Fecteau, Mark S. George, Bin He, Yun-Hee Kim, Letizia Leocani, Sarah H. Lisanby, Colleen Loo, Bruce Luber, Michael A. Nitsche, Walter Paulus, Simone Rossi, Paolo M. Rossini, John Rothwell, Alexander T. Sack, Gregor Thut, Yoshikazu Ugawa, Ulf Ziemann, Mark Hallett, Alvaro Pascual-Leone

Summary: This article provides recommendations for training practitioners in the safe and effective administration of NIBS techniques, covering three different types of practitioners. It discusses the basic and advanced knowledge and skills that practitioners need to possess, as well as recommendations for curriculum components. The article also encourages licensing and governing bodies to implement these guidelines.

CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

Electric Field Strength From Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Determines Degree of Working Memory Response: A Potential Application of Reverse-Calculation Modeling?

Kevin A. Caulfield, Aprinda Indahlastari, Nicole R. Nissim, James W. Lopez, Holly H. Fleischmann, Adam J. Woods, Mark S. George

Summary: Using reverse-calculation modeling to individualize tDCS doses can reduce electric field variance at the cortex, potentially leading to more effective treatments for working memory.

NEUROMODULATION (2022)

Letter Clinical Neurology

A visual and narrative timeline of US FDA milestones for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) devices

Samantha L. Cohen, Marom Bikson, Bashar W. Badran, Mark S. George

BRAIN STIMULATION (2022)

Article Clinical Neurology

DLPFC stimulation alters working memory related activations and performance: An interleaved TMS-fMRI study

Ryan D. Webler, James Fox, Lisa M. McTeague, Philip C. Burton, Logan Dowdle, Edward Baron Short, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Xingbao Li, Mark S. George, Ziad Nahas

Summary: In this study, the researchers used interleaved TMS-fMRI to manipulate and observe neural activity during high cognitive load conditions. They found that TMS delivered during high cognitive load strengthened cognitive processing and increased activation in FPN nodes and deactivation in DMN nodes. These results suggest that exogenous perturbation of the DLPFC via single pulse TMS can enhance high cognitive demand processing.

BRAIN STIMULATION (2022)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?

Claudia A. A. Salazar, Wuwei Feng, Leonardo Bonilha, Steven Kautz, Jens H. H. Jensen, Mark S. S. George, Nathan C. Rowland

Summary: During rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be used to prime the motor system of stroke patients and potentially enhance therapy outcomes. However, the efficacy of tDCS varies among patients, which may be influenced by factors such as cortical infarct regions, motor tract injury, and connectivity changes. Neuroimaging techniques are needed to quantify these factors and understand the impact on tDCS delivery. This review summarizes the development of tDCS for stroke from a neuroimaging perspective and discusses potential strategies for personalized tDCS based on anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE (2023)

Editorial Material Clinical Neurology

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) decreases heart rate acutely in neonatal rats

Melanie W. Gail, Catrina Sims-Robinson, Heather Boger, Adviye Ergul, Rupak Mukherjee, Dorothea D. Jenkins, Mark S. George

BRAIN STIMULATION (2023)

暂无数据