4.1 Review

Risperidone long-acting injectable (Risperdal Consta®) for maintenance treatment in patients with bipolar disorder

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
卷 10, 期 11, 页码 1637-1658

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/ERN.10.143

关键词

bipolar disorder; bipolar maintenance; depot risperidone; maintenance treatment; relapse; risperidone long-acting injectable

资金

  1. Cephalon, Inc.
  2. Eli Lilly Co.
  3. GlaxoSmithKline
  4. Janssen Pharmaceutica
  5. Pfizer, Inc.
  6. Sanofi-Aventis
  7. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories
  8. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals
  9. Abbott Laboratories

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poor adherence to pharmacotherapy during maintenance-phase treatment of bipolar disorder is a common occurrence, exposing patients to a high risk of illness relapses, rehospitalization and other negative outcomes. In view of this, there has been a reawakening of interest in the potential of long-acting injectable antipsychotic medications to improve treatment outcome during bipolar maintenance therapy. Indeed, long-acting injectable medications have practical advantages of assuring delivery of medication at a prescribed dose, and perhaps also making it easier to monitor adherence, at least to the long-acting drug. However, there are important limitations to the long-term use of depot typical neuroleptics in patients with bipolar disorder, including risk of extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia, which may exceed that of patients with schizophrenia, and the potential for treatment-emergent exacerbation of depressive symptoms. Long-acting injectable risperidone (RLAI) has recently been approved for maintenance treatment in patients with bipolar I disorder. Evidence supporting the use of RLAI for this indication consists of several nonrandomized, open-label studies; one randomized, open-label trial; and two adequately powered randomized, double-blind trials. In general, these studies have shown RLAI to be effective for the prevention of relapse or hospitalization during bipolar maintenance treatment. In the double-blind studies, RLAI was associated with reduced relapse rates, increased time to relapse and greater control of clinical symptoms during maintenance treatment following initial stabilization, compared with oral medication treatment or placebo injection. RLAI appeared to be more effective for preventing manic/mixed episodes than depressive episodes. RLAI showed good tolerability across studies; however, dose-related extrapyramidal effects, sedation, weight gain and prolactin elevation may occur during long-term treatment. Responder-enriched designs and exclusion of important clinical subgroups in the double-blind trials may limit translation of these results to routine care settings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据