4.5 Review

Tumor markers for early detection of ovarian cancer

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 787-798

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1586/ERM.10.39

关键词

diagnostic; early detection; early stage; ovarian cancer; tumor marker

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30973175]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation for Returning Scholars of Education Ministry of China [0601-18920006]
  3. Scientific and Technological Research Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2007K09-09]
  4. Clinical Research Fundation of First Hospital of Xi'an Jiao Tong University of China
  5. Georgia Cancer Coalition (GCC)
  6. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA
  7. National Institute of Health [NIH R01 HD 41577]
  8. NIH/NCI
  9. Gynecologic Cancer Foundation (GCF)
  10. Fraternal Order of Eagles Cancer Research Award
  11. NIH
  12. Mercer University School of Medicine
  13. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [R01HD041577] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The overall mortality rate for ovarian cancer is 75%, but when diagnosed at stage I, 90% of patients can be cured. Strategies for early detection require high sensitivity (>75%) and extremely high specificity (99.6%) to attain a positive predictive value of at least 10%. When functioning alone, conventional markers fall short of this required sensitivity or specificity. Greater specificity can be achieved by combining multiple markers. Meanwhile, technological developments offer the potential identification of new candidate markers. Panels of new markers have been discovered with improved sensitivity and specificity for early-stage detection, but these require prospective validation. Through empirical development of: biotechnology (including monoclonal antibodies, gene expression, cloning of gene families and proteomics); statistical methods; and guidelines from specialized institutions, more candidate markers might be discovered and validated with systematic, efficient and cost-effective screenings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据