4.3 Article

Considerations on the development of a model of kidney bioengineering and regeneration in rats

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 597-601

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1586/17434440.2013.827528

关键词

extracellular matrix; function; kidney bioengineering; organ bioengineering; regeneration; scaffold; transplantation; urine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evaluation of: Song JJ, Guyette JP, Gilpin SE, Gonzalez G, Vacanti JP, Ott HC. Regeneration and experimental orthotopic transplantation of a bioengineered kidney. Nat. Med. 19(5), 646-51 (2013). Emergent technologies of regenerative medicine have shown immense potential to overcome the limitations of organ transplantation by supplying tissues and organs bioengineered ex vivo in the laboratory. So far, clinical translation has been possible for simple, hollow organs, whereas the bioengineering and regeneration of complex modular organs (namely, kidneys, hearts, livers, lungs and small bowel) remains far from our grasp. In the case of the kidney, the bioengineering and regeneration of renal organoids requires a supporting scaffold that approximates the biochemical, spatial and vascular relationships of the native kidney extracellular matrix. A recent report describes the use of rodent kidneys to generate whole organ, three-dimensional scaffolds. These scaffolds were subsequently seeded with rat neonatal kidney cells to reconstitute the parenchymal cell compartment and with human umbilical venous endothelial cells to reconstitute the endothelium and allow implantation. Once assembled and allowed to mature in bioreactors, the so-obtained constructs were able to exert some function peculiar to the kidney both in vitro and in vivo after implantation in rodents. In this invited commentary, we will address the most critical topics of organ regeneration starting from the above-mentioned experience with the kidney but eventually embracing the whole field of complex modular organs bioengineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据